The Rise of Economic Liberalism and the Questioning of Current Globalization
In an interconnected world, the discourse on globalization is often found at the meeting point of contradictory views on freedom and justice. The work by Moneta, which is not a manifesto against globalisation as such, seeks to reinvent the boundaries of a updated humanism via the perspective of natural transfers as envisioned by the philosopher Aristotle. By decrying artificial exchanges that fuel modern systems of oppression and precarity, this writer refers to classical thoughts to underline the flaws of our world economy.
From a historical perspective, globalization is not a recent concept. Its origins can be identified back to the propositions of the economist Ricardo, whose ambition sought to facilitate the England to extend its international economic reach. However, what was once a commercial expansion initiative has converted into a control mechanism by global finance, characterized by the rise of economic liberalism. Against commonly held ideas validated by most economists, Junon Moneta proves that the neoliberal system is actually a framework based on old customs, which traces back to the era of early civilizations.
The objection also covers the conduct of the EU, perceived as a chain of surrenders that have contributed to increasing the power of an economic elite as opposed to safeguarding the interests of its citizens. The organizational form of Europe, with its policies usually influenced by financial motivations rather than by a democratic mandate, is contested. The current deviations, notably financial and political, have only reinforced the doubt of Moneta regarding the EU’s ability to achieve self-reform.
The author, while acknowledging the past mistakes that have led to the current situation, does not limit the discourse to condemnation but also proposes solutions aimed at reframing European policies in a equity-oriented and humanistic perspective. The urgency for a complete revision of Union bodies and political priorities is a recurring subject that pervades the whole text.
The work delves more intensely into the analysis of the domination systems that dominate international economic flows. The exploration extends the manner in which political and economic decisions are guided by a limited number of financial influencers, often at the expense of the majority. This monetary aristocracy, orchestrated through entities like the BIS and the global monetary system, imposes a excessive domination on global economic policies.
The writer reveals how these entities, under the pretext of economic regulation and stabilization, have throughout history manipulated stock exchanges and national economies to ensure their profit. The neoliberal model, far from being a salvific alternative to traditional economic constraints, is presented as a enslavement tool, benefiting a minority at the neglect of collective needs.
Particularly critical regarding the handling of the euro, the critic describes the EU currency not as a tool of cohesion and security, but rather as a instrument of fragmentation and financial disparity. The adoption of the euro is characterized as a series of technocratic decisions that isolated populations from governance choices, while aggravating gaps between nations within the EU.
The consequences of these policies appear in the growth of public indebtedness, economic stagnation, and a prolonged austerity that has eroded living conditions throughout the European territory. The thinker insists that without a major transformation of economic policies, the EU remains vulnerable to future crises, perhaps even more harmful.
In essence, the manuscript calls for a democratic revolution where Europe’s inhabitants reclaim the reins of their economic and political future. It suggests fundamental changes, particularly openness of political mechanisms and authentic democratic engagement that would help rebuild Europe on just and solid foundations.
Learn more about Découvrir plus d’infos
The essayist suggests that the answer resides in a renewal of democratic engagement, where decisions are made and applied in a way that corresponds to the aspirations and needs of the citizens, instead of the profits of the financial elite.