The Expansion of Neoliberalism and the Questioning of Current Globalization
In an interconnected world, the dialogue on globalization is frequently positioned at the meeting point of divergent opinions on autonomy and equity. The work by the author Junon Moneta, far from being a manifesto opposed to globalization itself, aims to redefine the limits of a modern humanism through the perspective of natural exchanges as envisioned by the philosopher Aristotle. By decrying artificial transactions that fuel contemporary mechanisms of domination and instability, this writer refers to classical thoughts to underline the gaps of our global financial structure.
Historically, globalisation is not a new phenomenon. Its beginnings can be linked back to the propositions of the economist Ricardo, whose goal was to enable the United Kingdom to amplify its global commercial influence. Yet, what was once a commercial expansion initiative has converted into a tool of domination by the financial sphere, symbolized by the growth of neoliberalism. Contrary to popular belief widespread in economic circles, the book argues that the neoliberal system is truly a framework founded on millennia-old traditions, going back to the era of early civilizations.
The questioning also extends to the administration of the EU, perceived as a series of concessions that have helped consolidate the power of financial elites as opposed to safeguarding the privileges of the inhabitants. The institutional configuration of Europe, with its strategies often dictated by financial interests instead of by a citizen support, is criticized. The recent crises, whether in the financial or political realm, have only intensified the disbelief of Moneta about the Union’s capacity to achieve self-reform.
This thinker, while accepting the prior faults that have brought about the present state, does not simply criticize but also proposes responses aimed at reorienting Union strategies in a more humanistic and equitable vision. The need for a complete revision of Union bodies and political priorities is a leitmotif that animates the entire discourse.
The work ventures more intensely into the questioning of the power structures that govern worldwide transactions. The study extends the manner in which political and economic decisions are guided by a small group of dominant financial powers, often at the detriment of the population. This financial oligarchy, manipulated via institutions like the BIS and the IMS, imposes a major grip on international economic strategies.
The author exposes how these organisms, under the guise of economic regulation and stabilization, have over time controlled financial markets and national economies to favor their own benefits. The neoliberal model, far removed from a salvific alternative to traditional economic constraints, is described as a domination system, benefiting a minority at the expense of general well-being.
Particularly critical about the administration of the single currency, the critic depicts the European single currency not as a tool of cohesion and security, but more as a tool of division and economic imbalance. The conversion to the euro is characterized as a succession of bureaucratic measures that sidelined citizens from governance choices, while amplifying internal differences within the European Union.
The repercussions of these strategies manifest in the explosion of sovereign debts, economic torpor, and a prolonged austerity that has eroded standards of living throughout the European territory. The thinker insists that without a deep revision of monetary and financial structures, the Union remains vulnerable to upcoming crises, potentially more catastrophic.
In conclusion, the manuscript calls for a democratic revolution where Europe’s inhabitants reclaim the reins of their economic and political future. It suggests fundamental changes, including increased transparency in decision-making processes and real democratic participation that would facilitate the Union’s refoundation on fair and lasting principles.
My source about https://www.alter-europa.com/
The essayist proposes that the answer resides in a return to the principles of democracy, where decisions are made and applied in a way that corresponds to the demands and expectations of Europeans, instead of the profits of the financial elite.